Sunday, February 13, 2011

Books or TV (example)







Excellent organisation of points. Makes the argument very clear!



Sent to you by cav via Google Reader:

via Harrison's BLOG  on 13/02/11

Reading books is better than watching TV.

I agree with the statement above.In my personal opinion i think that books are better then tv because they provide various forms of entertainment and knowledge that TV cant create.

Firstly, Books contain knowledge and information that TV shows only have limited time and shows on, especially when we consider how much money it takes to create a program. The greatest writers in the world didnt host or create a TV show, they read books. Also books are always accessible and can be read at anytime whereas TV shows or only available a certain times.

Secondly, Books can create a vastly entertaining world through imagination and awesome creative writing. TV shows can only do this with a huge budget, especially if it is a science fiction theme which requires lots of high tech special effects to create a stimulating experience. From personal experiences, i discovered a sci fi genre of books and found it to be a page turning which satisfied me way more then any TV show.

Thirdly, Through an academic perspective reading books will vastly increase your creative and persuasive writing as well as understanding books and plots easier, making reading a whole lot more convincing to choose over bland TV.

In conclusion, Boos are better then TV because they provide; Easily accessible information and knowledge that can boost your academic skills and also entertain you for countless hours with page turning, stimulating novels. 



Things you can do from here:

No comments:

Post a Comment